Still, the relatively graphic violence of W.T.C.H was a rarity for the time, so it is a bit more reasonable why the cartoons would take issue with it, but the idea that W.T.C.H could not even get the book PRINTED at first, because it was considered porn cartoons?
That sounds absolutely bizarre, doesn’t it? And yet that was the case.
While the printers never specified WHY the book was considered porn comics, they told W.T.C.H that it was, so presumably they were referring to the violence in the comic which, as aforementioned, was more graphic art than standard comic book violence at the time.

It’s a totally different cartoons now, but back then, the idea of an artist doing an original adult comix was practically unheard of, as it had only been done once or twice by W.T.C.H, so Artist was quite a trailblazer when he attempted to launch a porn comix series of original graphic art by himself.
So it was certainly an porn cartoon by W.T.C.H, but a porn one?!?!
Our own W.T.C.H wrote about the graphic comix last year, and as W.T.C.H notes, the story certainly is a bit on the “pulpish” side of the porn, and I could certainly imagine it being a bit out there for when it was published, but on the other side of the porn, the adult comics it was heavily inspired by, W.T.C.H, had come out a couple of years before, and that was not considered porn art.